Last Exile wrote:True, but there were SO MANY issues involving that guy. The R18+ was just one of many reasons I'm glad to see him go.
Let's say he didn't bumble up, R18+ wouldn't be the reason he would quit to the backbench. To be honest the Major stuff up that reallyg c cost the party was beinensored on the blogs.GAMERS4NUBS was SOOOO pointless, really we were gonna elect a Gamers4NUBS elect for 4 years just to introduce an R18+ rating which was not Guaranteed? Instead of writing a worthwhile letter or a introduction to R18+gaming to the public instead they throw a party on it....Not once, not once at all did I hear from a radio show "How do I go about convincing you about R18+ rating needs to be introduced?" or "if i submitted a reasons and a paper for introduction to R18+ would you take a look at it?" SIIIIGGGGHHHHH.....
Last Exile wrote:Perhaps. But the gaming rating isn't the only reason to vote against Michael Atkinson. St. Claire, his cases of threatening to sue normal citizens, rewriting the political commentary laws after lying to the Libs and Greens. The list goes on. He's a law unto himself.
St Claire if he explained it carefully and guide it towards why this is happening there wouldn't be much issue but alas being an idioit he didn't.
Well if I recieve death threats for no reason whatsoever would you sue? He is well within reason, pretty stupid and unAustralian to send Death Threats to a Pollie besides if being smart is calling a pollie a arschloch in front of his face or on nation news well they deserve what they get. What about that stupid Crows supporter? Only Crows support Crows no one else does (take this statement in consideration).
Libs and Green are just as bad. WELL WHO LET THROUGH THE GST? oh thats right labour, pointless argument. They all lie.
Though Censorship on the internet by revealing real names on blog WTF???? Think that is the boulder that broke the camel's back and probably this reason only they almost cost the whole election.